Q. Will a claim for the recovery of unpaid monies by a firm of engineers, be subject to the Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes?
A. Yes, decided Mr Justice Jackson in the case of Cundall Johnson and Partners LLP v Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust [2007].
The case, whilst dealing with other issues, concerned a claim by the claimant, Cundall Johnson and Partners LLP, against the defendant, Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust, for the recovery of professional fees arising from the demolition of certain buildings. The case could equally apply to an engineer’s claim for fees against a contractor.
The parties entered into correspondence with one another, with the defendant requesting paperwork from the claimant in order that it could verify whether or not the fees claimed were indeed due. When this paperwork was provided, it was illegible. Lawyers were subsequently instructed by both parties, yet the claimant failed to provide clear versions of the necessary paperwork, and instead issued court proceedings without complying with the Protocol.
At court, the claimant submitted that it did not have to comply with the Protocol as the claim was a matter of simple debt recovery. The Protocol is stated to apply ‘to all construction and engineering disputes’, subject to some exceptions detailed at paragraph 1.2 of the Protocol.
As the claim for the recovery of fees did not fall within one of the exceptions listed at paragraph 1.2 of the Protocol, the judge held that the Protocol did apply and the fact that it could be characterised as a debt recovery claim was not relevant.
As a result of this breach of the Protocol, the judge ordered that proceedings be stayed whilst the parties complied with the Protocol.
It is clear from this ruling that parties to a dispute and their legal advisors should pay careful consideration as to whether or not the Protocol will apply to their claim, before rushing into legal proceedings.